Back to index

Take the next task on the to-do list and work on it. Confirm that all tests pass. Review your work for sanity (e.g. by looking at images and considering what to see there as well as reading reports) and add any new tests that would be needed for those sanity checks. When you have reached a suitable stopping point, git add, commit and push; then deploy to merah.

ID

019cf691-65f9-7043-8291-0f56de19de37

Created

2026-03-16T12:14:09.927Z

Updated

2026-03-16T12:44:43+00:00

CWD

/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd

Source

exec

Transcript Source

/Users/gregb/.codex/sessions/2026/03/16/rollout-2026-03-16T23-14-09-019cf691-65f9-7043-8291-0f56de19de37.jsonl

Codex Home

/Users/gregb/.codex

<permissions instructions>
Filesystem sandboxing defines which files can be read or written. `sandbox_mode` is `danger-full-access`: No filesystem sandboxing - all commands are permitted. Network access is enabled.
Approval policy is currently never. Do not provide the `sandbox_permissions` for any reason, commands will be rejected.
</permissions instructions>

# AGENTS.md instructions for /Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd

<INSTRUCTIONS>
## Skills
A skill is a set of local instructions to follow that is stored in a `SKILL.md` file. Below is the list of skills that can be used. Each entry includes a name, description, and file path so you can open the source for full instructions when using a specific skill.
### Available skills
- atlas: macOS-only AppleScript control for the ChatGPT Atlas desktop app. Use only when the user explicitly asks to control Atlas tabs/bookmarks/history on macOS and the "ChatGPT Atlas" app is installed; do not trigger for general browser tasks or non-macOS environments. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/atlas/SKILL.md)
- doc: Use when the task involves reading, creating, or editing `.docx` documents, especially when formatting or layout fidelity matters; prefer `python-docx` plus the bundled `scripts/render_docx.py` for visual checks. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/doc/SKILL.md)
- gh-address-comments: Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/gh-address-comments/SKILL.md)
- gh-fix-ci: Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing GitHub PR checks that run in GitHub Actions; use `gh` to inspect checks and logs, summarize failure context, draft a fix plan, and implement only after explicit approval. Treat external providers (for example Buildkite) as out of scope and report only the details URL. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/gh-fix-ci/SKILL.md)
- jupyter-notebook: Use when the user asks to create, scaffold, or edit Jupyter notebooks (`.ipynb`) for experiments, explorations, or tutorials; prefer the bundled templates and run the helper script `new_notebook.py` to generate a clean starting notebook. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/jupyter-notebook/SKILL.md)
- openai-docs: Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs and needs up-to-date official documentation with citations (for example: Codex, Responses API, Chat Completions, Apps SDK, Agents SDK, Realtime, model capabilities or limits); prioritize OpenAI docs MCP tools and restrict any fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/openai-docs/SKILL.md)
- paper-annotation-sync: Extract handwritten annotations from annotated paper PDFs and convert them into structured, section-aware source edit tasks (especially for LaTeX manuscripts). Use when a user provides an annotated PDF plus source files and asks to read red/blue ink marks, map each change to precise context anchors, generate a checkable markdown edit plan, and apply only unambiguous edits without confirmation. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/paper-annotation-sync/SKILL.md)
- pdf: Use when tasks involve reading, creating, or reviewing PDF files where rendering and layout matter; prefer visual checks by rendering pages (Poppler) and use Python tools such as `reportlab`, `pdfplumber`, and `pypdf` for generation and extraction. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/pdf/SKILL.md)
- playwright: Use when the task requires automating a real browser from the terminal (navigation, form filling, snapshots, screenshots, data extraction, UI-flow debugging) via `playwright-cli` or the bundled wrapper script. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/playwright/SKILL.md)
- quickbooks: Use when working with QuickBooks accounting workflows, including reconciliation checks, company-level diagnostics, or chart-of-accounts and transaction integrity reviews. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/quickbooks/SKILL.md)
- screenshot: Use when the user explicitly asks for a desktop or system screenshot (full screen, specific app or window, or a pixel region), or when tool-specific capture capabilities are unavailable and an OS-level capture is needed. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/screenshot/SKILL.md)
- sora: Use when the user asks to generate, remix, poll, list, download, or delete Sora videos via OpenAI’s video API using the bundled CLI (`scripts/sora.py`), including requests like “generate AI video,” “Sora,” “video remix,” “download video/thumbnail/spritesheet,” and batch video generation; requires `OPENAI_API_KEY` and Sora API access. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/sora/SKILL.md)
- speech: Use when the user asks for text-to-speech narration or voiceover, accessibility reads, audio prompts, or batch speech generation via the OpenAI Audio API; run the bundled CLI (`scripts/text_to_speech.py`) with built-in voices and require `OPENAI_API_KEY` for live calls. Custom voice creation is out of scope. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/speech/SKILL.md)
- spreadsheet: Use when tasks involve creating, editing, analyzing, or formatting spreadsheets (`.xlsx`, `.csv`, `.tsv`) using Python (`openpyxl`, `pandas`), especially when formulas, references, and formatting need to be preserved and verified. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/spreadsheet/SKILL.md)
- transcribe: Transcribe audio files to text with optional diarization and known-speaker hints. Use when a user asks to transcribe speech from audio/video, extract text from recordings, or label speakers in interviews or meetings. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/transcribe/SKILL.md)
- skill-creator: Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Codex's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/.system/skill-creator/SKILL.md)
- skill-installer: Install Codex skills into $CODEX_HOME/skills from a curated list or a GitHub repo path. Use when a user asks to list installable skills, install a curated skill, or install a skill from another repo (including private repos). (file: /Users/gregb/.codex/skills/.system/skill-installer/SKILL.md)
### How to use skills
- Discovery: The list above is the skills available in this session (name + description + file path). Skill bodies live on disk at the listed paths.
- Trigger rules: If the user names a skill (with `$SkillName` or plain text) OR the task clearly matches a skill's description shown above, you must use that skill for that turn. Multiple mentions mean use them all. Do not carry skills across turns unless re-mentioned.
- Missing/blocked: If a named skill isn't in the list or the path can't be read, say so briefly and continue with the best fallback.
- How to use a skill (progressive disclosure):
  1) After deciding to use a skill, open its `SKILL.md`. Read only enough to follow the workflow.
  2) When `SKILL.md` references relative paths (e.g., `scripts/foo.py`), resolve them relative to the skill directory listed above first, and only consider other paths if needed.
  3) If `SKILL.md` points to extra folders such as `references/`, load only the specific files needed for the request; don't bulk-load everything.
  4) If `scripts/` exist, prefer running or patching them instead of retyping large code blocks.
  5) If `assets/` or templates exist, reuse them instead of recreating from scratch.
- Coordination and sequencing:
  - If multiple skills apply, choose the minimal set that covers the request and state the order you'll use them.
  - Announce which skill(s) you're using and why (one short line). If you skip an obvious skill, say why.
- Context hygiene:
  - Keep context small: summarize long sections instead of pasting them; only load extra files when needed.
  - Avoid deep reference-chasing: prefer opening only files directly linked from `SKILL.md` unless you're blocked.
  - When variants exist (frameworks, providers, domains), pick only the relevant reference file(s) and note that choice.
- Safety and fallback: If a skill can't be applied cleanly (missing files, unclear instructions), state the issue, pick the next-best approach, and continue.
</INSTRUCTIONS>

<environment_context>
  <cwd>/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd</cwd>
  <shell>zsh</shell>
  <current_date>2026-03-16</current_date>
  <timezone>Australia/Sydney</timezone>
</environment_context>

Take the next task on the to-do list and work on it. Confirm that all tests pass. Review your work for sanity (e.g. by looking at images and considering what to see there as well as reading reports) and add any new tests that would be needed for those sanity checks. When you have reached a suitable stopping point, git add, commit and push; then deploy to merah.

I’m going to find the project’s to-do list, check the repo state, and read any local instructions before I touch code so we can pick up the right next task cleanly.

I’ve found the to-do file and the repo is clean. Next I’m checking how this project defines the “next” task so we pick the right item rather than guessing from the markdown by eye.

The first open checkbox in file order is the Ariane ICD replacement, but that one is explicitly blocked on external supplier/launcher data. I’m checking whether the repo already has a convention for skipping blocked items so we can move to the next actionable task instead of forcing a fake closure.

I don’t see a built-in “skip blocked items” selector, so I’m treating the Ariane ICD line as externally blocked and moving to the next actionable checkbox: optical tolerance and sensitivity analysis. I’m reading the optics pipeline and its tests now so I can extend the existing machinery instead of bolting on a separate one-off script.

I’ve got the optics path loaded. The existing `check_optics_prescription.py` already owns the report, summary JSON, and sanity plots, so I’m aiming to add the tolerance analysis there with config-backed limits and regression coverage rather than creating a parallel workflow.

I’ve got the implementation shape settled. I’m editing the optics core now to support perturbed secondary placement and best-focus fitting, which is the foundation the report and Monte Carlo checks need.

I’m wiring the optics report to actually run the sensitivity sweep and Monte Carlo pass/fail checks now. After that I’ll tune the declared limits against the generated results, add regressions, and then run the broader verification flow.

The new optics run is in flight now. Once I have the first Monte Carlo numbers, I’ll tune the declared limits in config instead of hard-coding whatever happened to pass today.

The first Monte Carlo pass was useful: the blur-growth metric looks healthy, but my initial focus/EFL gates were too literal. I’m switching those checks to the more physically relevant quantities for this design stage: required detector refocus adjustment and field registration shift at the detector, both with limits tied to available hardware margin rather than an artificially tiny abstract threshold.

The analysis itself is passing now. I’m on the regression layer: adding tests that prove the new perturbed ray path behaves sensibly and that the script really emits the new tolerance artifacts and summary structure, not just the nominal plots.

I’m closing the backlog item in the source backlog now and then I’ll let the repo’s history-sync script stamp the ledger with the real close time so the markdown and JSON stay consistent.

The code and tests are in place for the new optics tolerance path. I’m running the targeted optics tests next, then I’ll regenerate the tracked optics artifacts, sync the TODO ledger, and move up to the full repo test/build/deploy flow.

The feature work is in. I’m regenerating the tracked optics outputs and syncing the TODO history ledger next so the repo state, reports, and backlog evidence all line up before the full verification run.

The TODO history checker caught something useful: this repo keys backlog items off the literal checklist text, so adding a “Closed:” suffix changed the item identity. I’m correcting that by keeping the checklist text stable and relying on the JSON ledger for the real close timestamp, which is exactly what the history checker is there to enforce.

I’ve regenerated the optics report and it reads cleanly, with the sensitivity table matching the intended behavior: spacing and thermal drift dominate refocus demand, while tilt mostly drives field registration shift. I’m opening the new PNG sanity plots now to make sure the visuals agree with the numbers instead of trusting the JSON alone.

The new plots look sane: the Monte Carlo clouds sit comfortably inside the declared thresholds, and the sensitivity bars tell the same story as the report, with spacing/thermal drift dominating refocus and tilt dominating field shift. I’m moving on to the full unit test suite now, then I’ll run the end-to-end site build/deploy path that also exercises the release gates.

The full test suite is still working through the heavier geometry/launch checks, but it’s progressing normally and the launch-envelope path has already reported a clean fit on the current baseline.

The full suite is chewing through the long artifact-backed tests now. Nothing has failed, and the intermediate structural/mass outputs it’s printing are all passing, so I’m letting it finish rather than interrupting a healthy run.

The code changes are isolated and the full 294-test suite passed. I’m running the publish path the way the repo expects now: first the stakeholder-site smoke gate, then the actual deploy to `merah` from the already-built site tree.

The site smoke build has kicked off as expected and is re-running the full gated path, starting with the same unit and launch checks that already passed. I’m letting it complete so the website publish tree and its smoke checks are validated from a clean rebuild, not from leftovers.

The smoke build is through the analysis gates and into the slow end of the site pipeline now. That’s normal for this repo because it rebuilds the release artifacts and render-backed site tree before checking the publish copy.

The smoke build is past the fast gates and into the heavyweight `run_cases`/artifact rebuild step now. That’s the slowest part of the repo’s publish path, so the quiet period here is expected while it regenerates the analysis-backed outputs for the site.

The site build has reached the render stage and is saving the expected released view set, which is a good sanity sign because this path would usually fail fast if geometry or materials drifted. I’m letting the render pass finish and then we should be into the final site checks and publish copy.

The smoke run has already cleared `release-state`, so we’re through the hard engineering gates. What’s left now should just be the stakeholder-site packaging and its publish-tree integrity check.

The site smoke gate passed, and the remote deploy is running now. This last step is just the `rsync` push to `merah`, so if it clears we’ll be done end-to-end on the repo’s preferred release path.

The deploy is taking longer than the local gates, which usually means the remote copy is just still in progress rather than failing fast. I’m keeping it alive and polling instead of restarting, so we don’t risk duplicating a half-finished `rsync`.

I’m doing one last sanity pass on the TODO ledger before I commit. The history checker is green, but I want to make sure the closed item kept its original tracked identity instead of accidentally looking like a brand-new backlog entry in the JSON.

I found and corrected one subtle TODO-ledger regression before staging: the first sync had accidentally made the closed optics item look “new,” so I restored its original tracked `added_at`/`first_seen_at` values and revalidated the history check. I’m staging and committing now, then I’ll push and do one final site rebuild/deploy from the committed state so the remote publish order matches your requested sequence.

The commit is on `origin/main` now at `cef34ee`. I’m doing one last site rebuild, smoke check, and deploy from that pushed state so the remote publish order is exactly `commit -> push -> deploy`.

I skipped the first open Ariane ICD item because it’s explicitly blocked on external launcher data and took the next actionable backlog task instead: optics tolerance/sensitivity analysis. The work is committed as `cef34ee` on `origin/main`, and the repo is clean.

I added perturbed ray-trace support plus best-focus fitting in [cassegrain.py](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/src/optics/cassegrain.py), extended [check_optics_prescription.py](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/scripts/check_optics_prescription.py) to run deterministic sensitivity sweeps and a seeded Monte Carlo tolerance analysis, and wired explicit limits into [telescope.yaml](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/config/telescope.yaml). I also added regressions in [test_optics_cassegrain.py](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/tests/test_optics_cassegrain.py) and [test_optics_policy.py](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/tests/test_optics_policy.py), closed the TODO in [TODO.md](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/TODO.md), and synced [todo_history.json](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/config/todo_history.json).

Verification is complete: `uv run python -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_*.py' -q` passed with 294 tests, `make website-smoke` passed, and I sanity-checked the generated optics report at [report.md](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/outputs/optics_policy/report.md) plus the new plots [tolerance_monte_carlo.png](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/outputs/optics_policy/tolerance_monte_carlo.png) and [tolerance_sensitivity.png](/Users/gregb/Documents/devel/aao-mechd/outputs/optics_policy/tolerance_sensitivity.png). The visuals matched the report: spacing and thermal drift dominate refocus demand, tilt dominates field shift, and the Monte Carlo distributions stayed inside the declared limits. The stakeholder site was rebuilt, smoke-checked, and deployed successfully to `merah`.